Commercial Real Estate

Feldman to share his expertise at NBI Foreclosure Seminar

Jay B. Feldman, an associate with Ansell Grimm & Aaron, P.C. working in the fields of Bankruptcy, Creditor’s Rights and Litigation will be a featured speaker at the National Business Institute’s Dec. 8 seminar on Foreclosures and Loan Workout Procedures at the Holiday Inn, Princeton, 100 Independence Way. Mr. Feldman will be speaking about deeds in lieu of foreclosure, lender liability issues, and receivership.

To register for the seminar please visit the NBI website at: Bootcamp: Foreclosure and Loan Workout Procedures.  Attendance at the seminar satisfies state-mandated continuing legal education requirements for New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania. The seminar runs from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. with a 1 hour lunch break at noon. An audio CD and coursebook, or an on-demand audio recording of the seminar will be available for purchase for those who cannot attend.

This is a practical, basic-to-intermediate level course designed for:

  • Attorneys
  • Real Estate Professionals
  • Title Insurance Professionals
  • Lenders
  • Paralegals

 

AGA Attorney to discuss Foreclosures on 920 AM The Voice

Pam Mulligan, attorney in Ansell Grimm & Aaron’s Princeton office, will be the featured guest on 920AM, The Voice on Sunday, Nov. 1.  Ms. Mulligan will discuss  New Jersey foreclosures including a look at recent statistics, review of the New Jersey foreclosure process, the difference between commercial and residential foreclosures and avenues that banks may take other than foreclosure.

 

Ansell Hires New Attorney

AGA welcomes Pamela A. Mulligan to the firm.  Ms. Mulligan is Counsel and focuses her practice in the areas of Litigation, Real Estate and Creditors’ Rights. Ms. Mulligan represents secured and unsecured lenders including corporate and banking clients, in Chapters 7, 11, and 13 bankruptcies, contested and uncontested foreclosures, collection matters, and commercial loan transactions. She also represents businesses and individuals including artists and media organizations in copyright, trademark and general litigation matters. Ms. Mulligan is working closely with our Community Association Group on business development and marketing initiatives.

Prior to joining Ansell Grimm & Aaron, Ms. Mulligan had a lengthy career as a business development executive working on national marketing programs for some of the nation’s largest entertainment, media and non-profit organizations.  Ms. Mulligan was previously with prominent New Jersey law firms where she represented national and community banks, businesses, and individuals.

 

North Jersey Office Relocation

Ansell Grimm & Aaron, P.C. is pleased to announce the relocation of its North Jersey office from Clifton to Woodland Park.  The new office address is 365 Rifle Camp Road. All other contact information remains the same.

Largest Franchise to Franchise Purchase in Domino’s History

Jason S. Klein, Esq., a partner with the firm, represented Pizza Properties of Indianapolis, Inc., and its principal, Robert Taylor, III, in connection with the sale of 45 Domino’s stores throughout Indiana to RPM Pizza LLC, the largest U.S. Domino’s franchisee.  For Pizza Properties, headquartered in West Chester, Pennsylvania, the sale of the 45 stores in Indiana was reported to be the largest franchise-to-franchise purchase in Domino’s history. The sale included nearly 40 stores in the Indianapolis metro area, and stores serving South Bend and Lafayette. Pizza Properties continues to own and operate approximately 15Domino’s stores located throughout Pennsylvania, Maryland and Delaware.

 

Abyssinian Development Corp. is target of homeowner gripes

New York, New York — Ansell Grimm & Aaron, P.C. recently commenced an action in New York State Court against the Abyssinian Development Corporation (“ADC”) and its contractor, Apex Building Company (“Apex”), alleging that the home it sold through a federal and state funded program is riddled with design and construction defects rendering it unsafe and uninhabitable.  As recently reported in the New York Daily News, the Complaint seeks $1,000,000.00 in damages arising from the defendants’ alleged misconduct.

As set forth in the Complaint, Christina Robilotto entered into a contract with ADC to purchase a home as part of the Federal Housing Administration 203(k) Loan Program, operated jointly by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and the  Local Initiatives Support Corporation, a New York non-for-profit corporation (“LISC”).  The federal government designed these loans to encourage lenders to fund seemingly risky home purchases to promote neighborhood revitalization and greater homeownership.

In accord with the express terms of the Purchase Contract, ADC represented that it would construct the premises in compliance with the Architectural Plans and the New York City Building Code and that:  “The quality of construction shall be comparable to local standards customary in the particular trade and substantially in accordance with the Plans.”

The Complaint alleges that these and other representations by ADC were false and that the home instead suffers from material deign and construction defects.  Among other problems, the building’s facade is falling off, the sheetrock is covered with mold as a result of water leaks in the foundation and through the roof, and an improperly installed boiler has led to heating problems.  The Complaint further alleges that although the homeowner repeatedly contacted ADC and Apex to complete the construction and make necessary repairs, they instead walked away from their contractual obligations.

As a result, a publicly financed program intended to promote home ownership by low and middle income families has instead saddled them with homes plagued by problems which they cannot afford to repair having dedicated their savings to the purchase.

Ansell Grimm & Aaron attorney Joshua S. Bauchner, who lives in New York, commented that “ADC has a horrible reputation with respect to the properties it manages and builds.  Although it seeks to hide behind its affiliated church, its purported mission to support low and middle income families though affordable housing has failed miserably.  We intend to hold them to account.”

* * *

For more than 80 years, ANSELL GRIMM & AARON, P.C. has been dedicated to providing excellent legal services throughout the Central New Jersey region.  The Firm has vast experience and knowledge in nearly all areas of the law, focusing primarily on New Jersey, New York and Federal matters.  In providing zealous advocacy and skilled legal advice to our diverse clientele, our attorneys all practice with a common philosophy… commitment to excellence and commitment to people.

For additional information, please contact Joshua S. Bauchner at (973) 247-9000.

 

 

ICSC U.S. Shopping Center Law Conferene

Melanie J. Scroble, Esq., recently attended the 2014 ICSC U.S. Shopping Center Law Conference in Orlando, Florida, as a round table speaker. Ms. Scroble led a roundtable discussion on the topic of When is Your Due Date …for Possession? A discussion of the rent commencement clause in the commercial lease. Roundtable speakers are chosen for their prior expertise with the particular topic. The conference is held by the International Council of Shopping Centers and hosts over 1,200 legal professionals in the retail real estate industry.

Shopping Center Law Conference in San Diego

Melanie J. Scroble recently attended the 2013 ICSC U.S. Shopping Center Law Conference in San Diego, California as a speaker. Ms. Scroble led a roundtable discussion on the topic of Tenants In Common (TIC’s) – A Discussion of the Popular Trend for Purchasing and Exchanging Commercial Property. The discussion included the related topic of utilizing TIC’s in a 1031 exchange setting and the newer trend Delaware Statutory Trusts. The conference is held by the International Council of Shopping Centers and hosts over 1,200 legal professionals in the retail real estate industry.

The Assignment Clause in an Agreement of Sale: No Party May Assign This Agreement, or Can They?

No Party May Assign this Agreement. This sentence appears to the untrained eye to be a simple and clear prohibition of an assignment in an agreement of sale. But, like in any legal document, nothing that appears to be simple and clear is simple or clear. Parties with this very clause in their agreement of sale have been permitted to assign all or a portion of their rights or duties thereunder due to a variety of reasons determined by various courts. If an assignment is prohibited in a purchase and sale agreement, can a party assign anyway? Does seller’s consent always have to be reasonable? This article answers those questions and discusses at length varying prohibitive assignment language that appears in a purchase and sale agreement, how such language has been interpreted by courts, and drafting tips for buyers and sellers on what language to use to best meet their needs in the transaction.  To read more about this article by Melanie Scroble, Esq., please click here.

Note: This article was reprinted from the May 2013 issue of ALM Commercial Leasing Law and Strategy, with permission from ALM Law Journal.